News on 20 November 2000

ASB proposals may change corporate property strategy

Corporate PFI may be the only form of "off-balance sheet" financing available in the future. This was one of the messages from a presentation by Peter Vernon of PricewaterhouseCoopers to the UK Chapter of Nacore last week.

Vernon described the changes to lease accounting proposed by the Accounting Standards Board. Currently leases are classified as either finance or operating leases. If the net present value of the minimum lease payments is greater than 90% of the value of the asset, then it’s a finance lease (ie a form of borrowing), if not then it’s an operating lease.

The ASB proposals would effectively remove the distinction, all leases would be treated the same, as assets that needed to be financed and which should therefore be on the balance sheet.

Peter Vernon speaking at last week's Nacore meeting

The changes will not change business fundamentals but are aimed at ensuring that financial statements represent ‘economic reality.’ Arguably, to distinguish a finance from an operating lease is a distortion of economic reality. The key point, argues, Vernon is that the ASB’s proposals will put new information in the public domain: "They will show how corporations are constrained by long and/or inflexible leases which are difficult and expensive to get out of."

Two companies adopting different property strategies, one predominantly lease based the other freehold, would have very different balance sheets. New information will lead to a sharper focus on property financing decisions – Why is a company financing property the way it is? Has it got the balance right?

Under the proposals longer leases would have a larger impact on the P&L, particularly in the early years. Vernon suggested that the changes might accelerate demand for shorter leases as well as leading to an increase in freehold ownership and outsourcing. "Occupiers should be arguing for more flexible leases and be prepared to pay for them. Short-term leases have been elusive because neither landlords or tenants are placing a proper value on them. From an occupier’s perspective, one strategy might to be to minimise the net present cost of property, taking account of uncertain future requirements."

The proposals could be enacted within two to three years, so Peter Vernon’s answer is to think about this issue now.

www.asb.org.uk
www.nacore.org.uk

Tell someone about this!

Back to front page Back to news overview Next news story