News on 12 December 2000

Speedier equal pay tribunals

The Government is to speed up equal pay hearings according to employment minister Tessa Jowell, who yesterday announced a consultation paper to tackle the 18% gender pay gap.

At the Women's National Commission Conference in London, Jowell said: “If we are to make real progress on pay equality, we must streamline the system for dealing with equal pay claims.”
The consultation paper 'Towards Equal Pay for Women’ puts forward proposals to cut the delays, which Jowell says make it harder for women to achieve pay parity and are bad for business and claimants.

“The gender pay gap has halved from 37% when the Equal Pay Act was brought in thirty years ago to 18% now, but it is still too high. Even without any breaks for children, a mid-skilled woman will still earns £240,000 less than a man over her working life. Last year nearly 2,500 equal pay complaints were made to employment tribunals and these cases can be very slow,” added Jowell.

Competitiveness minister Alan Johnson said: "Tribunals follow special procedures in equal pay cases, and we are keen to streamline these to provide an efficient and fair service for users, and lighten the burden these cases impose on the tribunals themselves. Equal Pay Tribunal cases are among the slowest and most complex going through the Tribunal system. I am working
closely with DfEE Ministers to help improve the process."

Stephen Alambritis, head of parliamentary affairs at the federation of small businesses, continued: "Equal pay claims can and should be resolved as speedily as possible in the best interests of both employers and claimants. Delays only drag out any unfairness at play, and the proposals are to be welcomed."

The CBI gave a mixed reaction and although the deputy director-general John Cridland thought it was good news to streamline tribunal proceedings, he said: “The proposal to remove the no-reasonable-grounds defence will worry business because it may make it more difficult to dismiss weak claims. It is a move in the opposite direction to recent tribunal reforms, which aim to free employer from defending no-hope cases.“

Jessica Jarlvi

Tell someone about this!

Back to front page Back to news overview