|  
        Representatives of building owners in the United States are fighting 
        any attempt to give telecommunications service providers the right to 
        take space in office buildings. 
       Last week the Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) International 
        testified before the House Telecommunications Study Committee of Tennessee's 
        House of Representatives in Nashville. 
       Bruce Lyman, advocacy team leader for BOMA International, spoke on behalf 
        of BOMA International's 17,500 member property owners and managers. He 
        urged lawmakers to accept that the market can efficiently govern building 
        access without compromising building owners' property rights.  
       BOMA International feels that forced access  the taking of space 
        by telecom service providers within office buildings for the installation 
        of equipment and wiring for free or at low, government-established prices 
         prevents property owners and managers from maintaining control 
        of the basic security and integrity of the building. 
       "The marketplace does not need government-mandated access; telecommunications 
        competition is alive and thriving in office buildings. Hundreds of license 
        agreements are being signed by office building owners and telecommunications 
        service providers every day. These transactions are negotiated at arm's 
        length and in a free market environment. Forced building access is unnecessary, 
        unmanageable and unconstitutional," said Lyman in his testimony. 
       "In order for an office building to remain competitive in today's 
        marketplace, it must offer tenants not only a wide array of telecommunications 
        services, but also an array of choices in telecommunications service providers. 
        As the commercial real estate business is fiercely competitive, we must 
        provide our tenants with access to the latest telecommunications services 
        or they will go elsewhere, and our buildings' operations will cease," 
        Lyman explained. 
       He cited BOMA's Critical Connections study in support of the Association's 
        position: "The largest and most reliable study conducted to date 
        on the issue documents that 98% of the tenants surveyed stated that their 
        property management company did provide access to the telecommunications 
        provider of their choice."  
       BOMA International has a long history of defending the rights of property 
        professionals on the forced access issue. The association has successfully 
        asserted in the past that forced building entry violates the Fifth Amendment 
        to the Constitution, which prohibits the taking of private property. 
       Richard Byatt 
       www.boma.org 
          
       |