FMs in the new-build driving seat

In a recent paper for a RICS 'cutting edge' research conference, John Hicks, Andrew Brown and Michael Pitt of Heriot-Watt University argued strongly in favour of involving facilities managers in capital building projects.

The ability of consultant project managers to deliver buildings in line with objectives for time, cost and quality, they noted, is viewed with increasing uncertainty. Evidence suggests clients frequently acquire an asset compromised in terms of its ability to contribute to core business functions.

The authors say clients may be better advised to engage a facilities manager, who will retain responsibility post-delivery, to control the procurement process and ensure that the building asset is optimised for core business needs over its lifecycle.

But, they warn, this approach will only work effectively if the FM has project management knowledge. In addition, the FM must be successful in securing the lead role in the design and construction process - something that project managers have often failed to do.

Other news from RICS shows conflicting pressures on construction tender prices. A somewhat tentative pre-millennium market is working against mounting labour costs to keep price rises generally in check.

Overall, the construction market remains very competitive. An increasingly evident characteristic is the north-south divide, with much stronger demand being felt particularly in the Southeast. New figures from other sources reinforce the existence of this divide, most notably in rates of pay, business output and new job opportunities.

Elliott Chase